Return to Home Page
A message from John Greaves, the spammed kid, that didn't get through because he can receive messages (that he doesn't want) but he can't send messages... Isn't that difficult to take 1 minute and delete his e-mail address from vsnet systems? This attitude is showing again a total lack of respect. It feels like you're saying in our face: "Keep complaining that I will keep laughing. I don't care at all." Sebastian. ------------------------ To: jg@jgjs.freeserve.co.uk Copies to: owner-vsnet-chat@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp From: The "vsnet-chat" mailing list maintainer <owner-vsnet-chat@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp> Subject: Submission to "vsnet-chat" rejected Date sent: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 04:12:26 +0900 (JST) You can't send message to this mailing list. Only addresses listed in our member file can post to the "vsnet-chat" mailing list. Please send request to <vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>, instead. -- VSNET Administrators / vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp ---- unsent message header follows ---- Delivered-To: vsnet-chat@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp Delivered-To: vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp From: "JG" <jg@jgjs.freeserve.co.uk> To: <vsnet-gcvs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>, <vsnet-chart@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>, <vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>, <vsnet-id@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 19:07:38 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: jg@jgjs.freeserve.co.uk Cc: <vsnet-gcvs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp> Message-ID: <vsnet-chat7003@hoge.baba.hajime.jp> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <01b601c39e4c$48f31860$0c01a8c0@saito> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.12a) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir MailGate (version: 2.0.1.14; AVE: 6.22.0.1; VDF: 6.22.0.19; host: dopp.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl- 11 Precedence: list X-Distribute: distribute [version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel=24] X-Sequence: vsnet-chat 0 Subject: [vsnet-chat 0] Re: V475 Sct chart and GZ Sct identification Errors-To: owner-vsnet-chat@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp I received six copies of this frigging email, not bad for someone who ain't subscribed. Maybe we ought to start a new list called vsnet-redundant-shit Automatica subscriptions to all mind. Watch this bugger bounce half a dozen times when I send it, coz I ain't subscribed, I'm just spammed John Hey, Taichi, you'd better get your lies rehearsed again, coz I'm in a bad mood now, and I deal as I am treat. On 29 Oct 2003 Sebastian Otero wrote: > New chart for V475 Sct and some clarifications on GZ Sct > > I've made a deeper chart for V475 Sct based on Arne Henden's photometry and > ASAS-3 data. http://ar.geocities.com/varsao/Carta_V475_Sct_tel2.htm > > While looking at Arne's photometry file, I've found that there is a bright > star near the position of GZ Sct, listed in the GCVS as a mira with a > photographic range 13.5 - <16.5 > GCVS position is: 18 49 51.9 -09 39 24 > The star is probably GZ Sct itself lying some arcseconds off from the > published position. > However, there is a 13th magnitude red star -that might even be constant > according to ASAS-3 data- that better matches the position in the GCVS so it > could e a matter of confussion.: 18 49 51.277 -09 39 22.55 (GSC2.2) > > GZ Scuti is actually GSC 5697 1462 at 18 49 51.248 -09 39 29.66 (GSC2.2). > It's very interesting to note that this star has experienced a very fast > bightening for a mira with a 570 days period, as can be seen from its ASAS-3 > lightcurve: > http://vsnet.astrouw.edu.pl/cgi-asas/asas_variable/184951-0940.0,asas3,0,500,0,0 > > During 900 days, the star was fainter than 14th magnitude and the only star of > the pair that was measure was the 13.1 mag. star 8" North. On August 10, it > became visible. Here is a table to show the facts: > > JD -2450000 V mag of blend V mag alone > 2853.74969 13.11 ?? > 2861.59687 12.57 13.65 > 2862.72411 12.49 13.42 > 2866.72476 11.90 12.34 > 2872.57130 11.45 11.73 > and in Arne's file it is at V= 10.93 witha B-V of 2.02. > > It deserves further monitoring because no ASAS-3 data have been taken ever > since. > > Maybe the previous maxima took place during Sun conjunction? > Maybe a faint maximum a couple of years ago? > Maybe a very large amplitude variable that shows rapid changes at the rising > branch. > > Regards, > Sebastian. > >
Return to the Powerful Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
