At 07:41 PM 6/18/00 -0700, you wrote: > My thanks to John for extracting the magnitudes from the UCAC catalogue >for the field near LMC V1341. I have done what was suggested in my earlier >post, by finding the mean offset of the UCAC magnitudes compared to V and then >applying that offset to stars closer to the variable. As John points out this >is not necessarily going to be perfect. However, because the four-fold >overlap of the UCAC frames will yield some averaging, and because northern >Chile is practically cloudfree for several months centered right in "LMC >season" (austral summer), it is near-certain that the LMC images were taken in >photometric conditions and that the internal consistency is likely to be high. (snip) > >I looked up each of the sequence stars and those John found close to V1341 in >USNO-A2.0 to look at their relative colors (and add the final decimals to the >coords for the new ones). None of the new stars is especially red, so I have >simply added 0.34 to the UCAC values to get a reasonable 'mv', which I show in >the second table below. (snip) >============================================= > >Name 1UCAC V/B-V V offset >LMC V1341 Field Stars > (2000) UCAC(r) mv color >GSC 9169-1555 5 09 04.9 -71 43 01 10.16 10.5 blue >GSC 9169-1568 5 09 45.9 -71 37 47 12.01 12.3 med >GSC 9169-1064 5 09 42.6 -71 47 16 12.86 13.2 med >1UCAC 5 11 51.4 -71 38 50 14.19 14.5 med >1UCAC 5 09 51.1 -71 34 00 15.13 15.5 blue > Hi all, As I produced the original chart for LMC V1341 in 1990, I should jump in and see how it can be updated. The first two stars in Brian's sequence above _do_ have published UBV data. As follows : - GSC 9169-1555 = P2856 : V = 10.71; B-V +1.56, U-B +1.83 (Table 2) GSC 9169-1568 = P2858 : 12.40 +0.52 -0.03 (Table 3) This data is taken from Grothues et al (Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. (1997) 121, 247). This paper and a companion paper (Gochermann et al Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 99,591) provide very extensive photometry for _foreground_ stars in the direction of the LMC. Table 2 gives better photometry; Table 3 data is said to be a slightly less reliable. No coordinates are given for any of the hundreds of stars measured. For that, one must refer to earlier papers by --Fehrenbach and Duflot 1970, A&A Spec. Suppl. 1,1 and continuations --Fehrenbach and Duflot 1981, A&A Suppl. 46,13-19 --Fehrenbach and Duflot 1982, A&A Suppl. 48,409-442 These authors produced several different lists, prefixed P,G,S,C.. We are only concerned here with their "Liste P" (galactic foreground stars). I don't know if the two sets of papers are linked (or can be linked) online. Would sure simplify extraction of quality data. Cheers, /Mati /=====================================\ | MOREL ASTROGRAPHICS | | Stellar Data & Information Centre | | c/o M. Morel | | 6 Blakewell Road, | | Thornton NSW 2322 AUSTRALIA | | Tel./fax: (02) 4966 2078 | | 151d38'33" E, 32d46'47"S | | e-mail: morel@ozemail.com.au | \=====================================/