Re: (fwd) On DV Dra identification > DV Dra can be very easily confused with this star - it is > certainly noteworthy, however I could not find any remarks on it > from 1995 outburst reports. There was no USNO at that time, and we noticed, as already cited, a slight difference in position from Downes & Shara (1993). However, astrometry of both observations were done near the limiting magnitude. The question is still open whether the USNO star is different from or identical with the true DV Dra or the "outbursting object" in 1995. The chart in the original discovery announcement of DV Dra was not good enough to discriminate such a subtle difference. The second outburst report contained no chart. Regards, Taichi Kato