Begin forwarded message: Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 11:44:56 -0500 From: Tom Droege <tdroege2@earthlink.net> Subject: Re: [AAVSO-DIS] Re: flares in Mira stars Tass has no rules and no funding agency to please. I listen to arguments. If there is a better way to run the Mark IVs, then I will consider a proposal. Otherwise, I do the easiest thing that I can do that gets the most results by my definition. The new data about to be put in the data base contains a lot of stuff. It is easy to find nice variables. Tom Droege At 10:55 PM 6/2/03 -1000, James Bedient wrote: >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Brian Skiff" <Brian.Skiff@lowell.edu> >To: <bedient@hawaii.rr.com> >Cc: <aavso-discussion@informer2.cis.McMaster.CA>; ><vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp> >Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 7:39 PM >Subject: Re: [vsnet-chat 6508] Re: [AAVSO-DIS] Re: flares in Mira stars > > > >I think Pojmanski realizes his current observing > > cadence isn't the best, and says as much at his Web site. > >Not intended as a criticism of ASAS-3! There just seems to be a lot of focus >on it (by others, not principals) as a be-all and end-all, while Paczynski and >Co. are up front about it as a step on a path. 1x/day samples are great for >finding periodic behavior in stars, even periodic behavior with periods much >less than the sample rate. Care must be exercised not to read too much into >any dataset, though. > >Jim > > >_______________________________________________ >aavso-discussion mailing list >aavso-discussion@mailman.McMaster.CA >http://mailman.McMaster.CA/mailman/listinfo/aavso-discussion
Return to the Powerful Daisaku
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp