Kato-san wrote: > While compiling observations, I noticed severe discrepancies in reported >B-V values of Nova Aql 1999. The Czech data reported in IAUC 7228 indicate >B-V of +0.3 to +0.4 while Moscow observations (reported to vsnet-obs) >indicate B-V of +1.2 to +1.3 on the same date. Considering the strong >interstellar lines and the location near the molecular cloud, I suspect >the redder estimate can be more realistic. I agree -- the redder values are correct. Here is my photometry of V1493 Aql: yymmdd HJD V B-V V-R R-I 990717 51376.7473 10.964 1.222 1.668 0.428 0.005 0.005 0.026 0.051 990720 51379.8288 11.569 1.254 1.869 0.409 0.003 0.010 0.013 0.083 990721 51380.8223 11.712 1.243 1.848 0.350 0.004 0.005 0.022 0.040 (the red errors are large because I was using short exposures to calibrate the 8.4mag Tycho star). You can see that my measures agree with the Moscow observations. Arne