I have analysed Stardial images (http://vsnet.astro.uiuc.edu/stardial/) between 1999 and 2002, of a number of regions in the constellation Monoceros. To reduce the unfiltered, red sensitive CCD images to magnitude lists, use was made of programs written by Michael Richmond (see http://vsnet.tass-survey.org, hereby gratefully acknowledged). The data revealed a number of new eclipsing binaries, which are listed below. RA Dec ID Type Ampl Epoch Freq c/d Note 104.575 -4.635 HD 51697 EA 0.2 2452640.75 1.798 105.271 -3.967 HD 52433 EA 0.3 2451586.64 1.339 108.783 -4.745 HD296761 EW 0.7 2452233.88 1.722 114.767 -2.657 BD-2 220 EW 0.4 2452323.65 1.440 BD-2 221? 121.574 -4.447 HD 67093 EA 0.5 2452252.86 0.461 Positions for 2000 are given in decimal degrees. One Stardial pixel corresponds to about 0.5', and the positional precision (averages over more than one hundred images) is on the order of 20". The identifications were made using Guide software (http://vsnet.projectpluto.com) and the VizieR utility at the CDS in Strasbourg (http://vizier.u-strasbg.fr/cgi-bin/VizieR). Note that the stars BD-2 220 and BD-2 221 are blended on a Stardial image, therefore the true identification of the variable is not clear. The frequency (in cycles/day) is given as a guide only (for EW stars, 2 minima are counted per cycle, for EA stars only one minimum): Stardial takes images separated by exactly one sidereal day, and the periodogram is therefore heavily contaminated with aliases. Any alias of the given frequency may be the correct one. One night's observations might reveal the true period. Observations are most welcome. Patrick __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com