From: "Mati Morel" <morel@ozemail.com.au> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 12:51:10 +1000 Subject: [vsnet-chat 5355] Re: Probable new faint variable star in Scorpius ----- Original Message ----- From: <aah@nofs.navy.mil> To: <aavso-discussion@informer2.cis.McMaster.CA> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 5:30 AM Subject: Re: [AAVSO-DIS] Probable new faint variable star in Scorpius > Mati Morel asked, regarding a possible variable: > >Is it this apparent variation real? Or have the A2.0 and GSC2.2 scans been > >fooled by the presence of close companions? > I am pretty sure both cataloging efforts were fooled by > the close companions. I took a BVRI set last night, and there > is nothing unusual about any of the stars in the arc. Objects > that are close enough to 'touch', though, will often feed through > automatic star detection algorithms. For example, your arc > of stars appears in my automated reductions as the single detection > RA(J2000) DEC V B-V V-R R-I > 16:51:41.75 -29:41:58.9 17.026 0.973 0.634 0.555 > This is a very dense field and I bet if you look around, you will > find other examples of such mergers. > However, the star you chose for EF Sco is in my dataset at > RA(J2000) DEC V B-V V-R R-I > 16:51:40.35 -29:41:25.5 13.704 1.960 1.213 1.181 > This works out to a Bmag of 15.7, which seems out of the > 13.3-14.4p range you quote. I'll get another dataset and > see if we can identify the variable by its variation. OOPS! Thanks Arne. I thought EF Sco would be relatively easy to identify, being one of the brighter variables. Obviously one has to be careful here, as well. A very red star like this one cannot be a RR Lyr star. Another nearby candidate might be one at 16h51m45.08s -29 41'18.4", b = 14.7. Nikolai Samus of the GCVS team has contacted me; they are working through the same list of variables, and meeting the same problems in identifying them. Martha Hazen has provided assistance by locating the original workbooks and field sketches at Harvard.. Priority is being given to variables in Ophiuchus, for volume II of the GCVS; Scorpius is of lower priority. This appears to be the only certain way of identifying many variables in this busy star field. Regards, Mati morel@ozemail.com.au