[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-newvar 1054] re re HadV101
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 01:51:19 +0000
- To: vsnet-newvar@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- From: crawl@zoom.co.uk
- Subject: [vsnet-newvar 1054] re re HadV101
- Sender: owner-vsnet-newvar@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Patrick Schmeer wrote:
>In the following message "V1978 Cyg" should be replaced by "V1978 Sgr" in
each
>case (cf. [vsnet-newvar 1050]).
>
>Regards,
>Patrick
>
>On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 12:13:10PM +0000, crawl@zoom.co.uk wrote
>[vsnet-newvar 1051]:
>
>> http://vsnet.nofs.navy.mil/tmp/fchaablma_fch.html
>>
>> Suggests that no variable lies immediately near V1978 Cyg's position
etc...
and he's absolutely right
fortunately both the usno nofs cfra search and other searches I did were
based on a cut and paste of co-ordinates from the HadV101 announce mail,
and the cyg instead of sgr typo-esque bit was my own damn fault for doing
too many things at once.
Sorry all
John
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp