[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-newvar 1053] Re: re HadV101
- Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 20:48:54 +0200
- To: vsnet-newvar@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- From: Patrick Schmeer <extpasc@rz.uni-sb.de>
- Subject: [vsnet-newvar 1053] Re: re HadV101
- In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.20010812121310.0079c6a0@pop3.zoom.co.uk>; from crawl@zoom.co.uk on Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 12:13:10PM +0000
- References: <3.0.6.32.20010812121310.0079c6a0@pop3.zoom.co.uk>
- Sender: owner-vsnet-newvar@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In the following message "V1978 Cyg" should be replaced by "V1978 Sgr" in each
case (cf. [vsnet-newvar 1050]).
Regards,
Patrick
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 12:13:10PM +0000, crawl@zoom.co.uk wrote
[vsnet-newvar 1051]:
> http://vsnet.nofs.navy.mil/tmp/fchaablma_fch.html
>
> Suggests that no variable lies immediately near V1978 Cyg's position
>
> The variability of HadV101 can be seen, and it does seem to just have the
> right sort of brightness range to be equatable V1978 Cyg on the red plates.
>
> The following obs give about a year, ~360 days between maxima, very roughly
> twice the approximate 169 day value given for V1978 Cyg in the GCVS.
> ...
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp