At 09:27 28/12/00 -0600, Seiichi Yoshida wrote: >But in case of Q1995/021, now I think we should apply a MisV number >for it and make an announcement as one of our new variable stars, >because the "Q1995/021" name is only in the TA's secret (not >recommended to report to the public database) list. > sounds good to me... ...there are precedents with respect to objects which are called one thing, but were actually "pre-discovered", with the pre-discovery not necessarily recognising the true nature of an object, which in this case includes lack of certainty of variability. As I've noted before, few other groups release official IDs for suspects, only for confirmed, for various reasons. John JG, UK