From: Nick James <ndj@blueyonder.co.uk> Message-ID: <vsnet-newvar703@hoge.baba.hajime.jp> To: tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp (Taichi Kato) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 100 00:10:31 +0000 (GMT) Cc: vsnet-id@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp, vsnet-newvar@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp, Bela1996@aol.com, GUY@TAHQ.DEMON.CO.UK, crawl@zoom.co.uk, kl.bernhard@aon.at, ndj@blueyonder.co.uk, vsolj-db@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp, wquester@aol.com In-Reply-To: <200012251550.AAA05119@ceres.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp> from "Taichi Kato" at Dec 26, 0 00:50:16 am > I have noticed on the TA website the new variable called J0712+296. > I had frequently seen this name (and GEMJ0712+296) in reports to VSNET. > I haven't had even any idea this name comes from the TA. What is the > difference between 'J'-series and the TAV/TASV series? Should we use > designation or should we avoid (as in Q cases) using this? Full details and a chart are on TAEC 1267 dated 1998 Jan 28. Nick.