Re: [vsnet-newvar 494] re Haseda Variable 62 ID > pretty significant proper motions are given of RA 151+/-15 mas and Dec > -68.5+/-19 mas [where mas = milliarcseconds. UCAC1 mags are in a > passband that lives between Johnson V and R] I simply considered the large proper motion is an apparent one, that is from identifications of different stars (or combined stellar images) overlapped on this large-amplitude variable. However, if the star is a genuine low-luminosity star with conspicuous variablity, it may be a discovery of quite unique nature (the significance may even surpass, dependeing on the nature, Haseda's discovery of Nova Sct 2000). I hope the apparent discrepancy would soon be positively solved. The object is reported bright now, and provides a great opportunity before it returns to dormancy again. Regards, Taichi Kato