I wrote... > of variables give 1875 epoch end figures of 24.9' declination, whereas > the 1875 position of HadV62 is 27.5' declination end figures... ...this > doesn't look like a typographic/transcripting error is at work here. ...of course this doesn't inlclude my typo of writing HadV62 when I meant HadV64!!! That was just a typo :-<... ...the end figures are correct for HadV64. soz John