[vsnet-gcvs 134] Re: Variable stars in OGLE-II field

[Taichi Kato <tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>]

Re: Variable stars in OGLE-II field

>     After checking some OGLE-II fields, I have noticed that a considerable
> fraction of known GCVS/NSV variable stars in the OGLE-II fields has escaped
> from detection.

  (A general comment was posted to vsnet-chat and vsnet-survey).

   Further examples:

   Why OGLE-II missed a classical Cepheid?

180333.3 -300115 (2000.0) SGRV1437 CWB 15.7 17.1 B 44051.02 1.74793 35 A7
180333.2 -300113 (2000.0) BWC25775 I=17.743 V-I=1.41

   A difficult case.  V3900 Sgr and NGC6522 V7 have different coordinates,
while the latter has a counterpart in ISOGAL variable star catalog.
V3900 Sgr = NGC6522 V7?

180331.3 -300103 (2000.0) SGRV3900 LB: 17.0 17.6 P - - - M6

180331.2 -300100 (2000.0) ISOGALP_J180331.3-300101 15.02V (0.2) logP=1.625 
180331.3 -300100 (2000.0) NGC6522V7  17.02 17.61 irr

VSNET Home Page

---

vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

VSNET Home Page

Return to Daisaku Nogami

---

vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp