[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 5900] Re: The Negative Effects of the VSNET Email Policies
- Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 20:05:48 -0600
- To: Taichi Kato <tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- From: Michael Koppelman <lolife@bitstream.net>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 5900] Re: The Negative Effects of the VSNET Email Policies
- Cc: vsnet-chat@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- Delivered-To: vsnet-chat-archive@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- Delivered-To: vsnet-chat@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- In-Reply-To: <200301170257.LAA28438@pallas.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
On Thursday, January 16, 2003, at 08:57 PM, Taichi Kato wrote:
> This statement can cause a misunderstanding. Please have a look at
> e.g. vsnet-chat 5344, which relayed your call for obvervation.
> You were subsrcibed to this list (not many) in order to allow your
> postings.
I'm sorry but this isn't true. I started receiving message from
vsnet-campaign-v4641sgr, vsnet-campaign-dn, vsnet-obs and others
starting months before I posted that call for observations.
> We usually keep these information senders on the relevant lists, which
> is
> a quite natural list-maintaining policy. In processing administrative
> requests, we usually apply some sort of delay (variable depending on
> the
> list nature) before finally confirming whether the request is a valid
> one.
> This rule has been also used to avoid an instataneous subscription,
> message posting, and unsubscription, as in some spam postings. This is
> why we don't use automatic Majordomo processing.
I can understand why you moderate subscribes. I cannot understand why
you moderate unsubscribes. Many people emailed after I sent this
message and said they had the same trouble unsubscribing.
>
> People who have been unsuccessful in unsubscribing to some specific
> list may have sent a request to a wrong address (such as
> owner-vsnet-xxx);
> postings to these addresses (mostly spams and simple errors) are
> usually
> automatically discarded.
I'm sure this is true, but I have run majordomo lists in the past and I
know how to unsubscribe. In each case I received a confirmation stating
my request was received and had to be processed by the administrator.
These request have still not been attended to.
>
> Use vsnet-complaints list for further comment on this topic.
>
You mean I should subscribe to a list to get off the lists? =)
My main plea is to either automate the unsubscribe process or promptly
process those request. I'm excited to be subscribed to only the vsnet
lists I choose. I have great respect for your work.
Sincerely,
Michael Koppelman
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp