[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 5768] Re: [AAVSO-DIS] survey, pixy etc
- Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 16:22:23 -0700 (MST)
- To: macres@pro.onet.pl
- From: Brian Skiff <Brian.Skiff@lowell.edu>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 5768] Re: [AAVSO-DIS] survey, pixy etc
- Cc: aavso-discussion@informer2.cis.McMaster.CA,vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- Delivered-To: vsnet-chat-archive@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- Delivered-To: vsnet-chat@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- Delivered-To: vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Maciej wrote:
>> -the red stars are much brighter (the chip is very sensive in red?)
Yes, the chip is very red-sensitive, so unfiltered magnitudes of
red stars especially will be difficult to compare with others (visual, V,
even R filter).
>> -few times software failed identification variable stars and ids faint
>> ones as bright etc.
There could be many reasons for this: poor coordinates for the
variables, crowding, poor solution for the coordinates derived from the
CCD frames, etc. What are you doing about flat-field corrections?
What does Pixy2 do as far as calibration? With your likely magnitude
limits and image scale, you might get reasonable consistency by using
Tycho-2 photometry for mag. 7-9 stars adjusted to standard R. And thus
you would report R magnitudes, which should be fairly close for variables
with B-V < 1.0 or so.
\Brian
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp