I dont' know if Donn had a reply to that. With my rather meagre knowledge on magnetic systems, I would suggest to take the minimum as a reference for suspending the curves. The time of minimum most likely represents a well timed periodic event, probably an eclipse of a bright part....possibly the system is slightly inclined and we see only one column. It all looks quite interesting. As soon as AB Nor and BF Ara stop with their nonsense, I'll have a go at V1432 Aql too! ;-) Berto / CBA Pretoria PS I would rather refer to an uncertainty of 0.03 magnitude (not an error), although it probably only includes the standard deviation of the noise (K-C), not? >>> Taichi Kato <tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp> 09/01/02 06:13AM >>> From: "Donn Starkey" <starkey73@mchsi.com> Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 23:05:46 -0500 Taichi: I need some tutoring in light curve examination! Please find the composite of three nights of clear photometry on V1432 Aql at my ftp side at: http://starkey.ws/FTP%20Page/V1432%20Aql%20%20composite%20Photometry.jpg I have superimposed the curves and used the maxima as a synchronization point. I was refocusing during the minima on the JD515 curve, so I may have missed the actual minima. Why don't the minimas and the later parts of the curves more closely overlap? Are there actually 2 maximas and minimas per cycle [phase], and I am only catching 1/2 of the total cycle? Thanks! ============================================== The price of freedom is constant vigilance. Donn Starkey starkey73@mchsi.com http://starkey.ws AAVSO Observer SDB - CBA Indiana - VSNET Observing Team ==============================================