Hi Arne, On this topic I remember making UBV measures of a nova many years ago from Auckland where the B-V came out at -0.65 or similar. Quite nonsensical. The guys at Mt John said that this nova had the highest H beta emission they'd ever seen. But it illustrates your point about broadband photometry. Regards, Stan PS. The earlier message had a brief attachment - should have put this in the text. Apologies to all. ----- Original Message ----- From: <aah@nofs.navy.mil> To: <vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 3:37 PM Subject: [vsnet-chat 5261] Re: V4740 Sgr Photometry > Doug presented a compilation of the photometry > available for V4740 Sgr. > > Assuming that the photometry is properly calibrated (and > you should really check this, since the 2001 datasets > must obviously have different comparison stars than the > 2002 ones, based on the brightness of the nova), then > the problem probably resides in the fact that you are > using broad-band filters on a non-blackbody object. > Usually novae go into what is called the nebular phase > about this time period past the peak, and that is dominated > by emission lines. You really need to get a spectrum > and see what is going on. While the continuum is probably > too faint for your spectrograph, the emission lines might > peak high enough for you to detect with a long exposure. > You might give it a try, or find some kind professional > that will let you look over his/her shoulder. The Asiago > observers follow novae quite a bit; perhaps someone like > Rosino could be contacted. > Of course, if you think broadband filters are giving > you problems, just try to calibrate unfiltered photometry > of nebular-phase novae... > Arne