[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 4701] SARVs
- Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2001 21:14:47 +0000
- To: "Stan Walker" <astroman@voyager.co.nz>, "Klaus Bernhard" <kl.bernhard@aon.at>
- From: crawl@zoom.co.uk
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 4701] SARVs
- Cc: <vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- In-Reply-To: <001901c11dfb$3f23eb80$1f01a8c0@office>
- References: <3.0.6.32.20010802163556.00796cb0@pop3.zoom.co.uk><3.0.6.32.20010802210302.00795be0@pop3.zoom.co.uk><3B6C26C3.3C7EBF92@aon.at>
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Hiya Stan
At 10:03 06/08/01 +1200, Stan Walker wrote:
>But since there are some extremely interesting objects
>amongst the larger amplitude SR stars it's frustrating to see the SR
>category used as a sort of 'unclassified' dumping place. Maybe there is a
>case for an unclassified variable type? To my mind SARVs are SARVs and not
>SR stars.
In light of what you've said, you may be interested to note that the intro
to namelist 76 contains the following entry:-
>In the present Name-List, we have introduced two new variability
>types for variable stars. The prototypes are the stars of the present
>Name-List.
>
>Stars showing eclipses by their planets. Prototype: V376 Peg.
>
>Semiregular pulsating red giants with short period (several
>days to a month), probably high-overtone pulsators. Prototype: AU Ari.
So, your SARVs have possibly become AU Aur stars?????
Cheers
John
[NB I think jaavso's finally out, but no idea as to contents as of yet]
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
VSNET Home Page