Hans-Goran wrote: >> but what criteria must it be for to pick a useful >> comparing star for visual observations for a MIRA star Sra,Srb etc....? >> Example for TW LYR a star i have difficult to find useful comparing star >> in the surrounding field? Ah, looks like I answered a different question! I just had a look at the on-line AAVSO (e)-scale chart. This is one where the sequence was found from measuring a photographic plate on an iris-photometer. Chaz Scovil I'm sure did the best he could on these, but there are typically modest zero-point errors (few tenths of a magnitude) at the bright end, then almost always a scale error at the faint end for these, such that stars are rated progressively too bright as you go fainter compared to "truth", i.e. standard V. If the stars you are interested in are fairly faint, then Arne Henden might be willing to get a set of BV frames to allow the sequence to be corrected down to some faint limit (V ~16 or 17) with stars close to the variable. For brighter stars (roughly V < 10.5), which are necessarily farther afield, then it is probably okay to use Tycho-2 stars after corection to the standard system. In general it is preferable for visual observing to choose stars with B-V color < 1.5 or so if they are available in the field. TW Lyr is fairly far from the galactic plane, so the stars should not be much reddened, although it is on the "dusty" side of the Milky Way in this region. It is easy to check the bright stars in the field (I can do this if you wish), but for fainter ones, new data are required. The existing survey catalogues (GSC, A2.0, UCAC, etc.) are not sufficiently accurate and are not on the standard systems, so you can't (or shouldn't) use those except 'in extremis'. Unfortunately I am not a position to observe faint stars regularly myself at the moment, although it is something I'd like to be able to do. \Brian