[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 4624] Re: Photometry of variables involved with other stars
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 12:02:46 +0100
- To: Gianluca Masi <gianmasi@fr.flashnet.it>
- From: Rudolf Novak <novak@hvezdarna.cz>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 4624] Re: Photometry of variables involved with other stars
- CC: vsnet chat <vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>, CCD-astrometry-photometry@yahoogroups.com
- References: <3B56892E.28D0127F@fr.flashnet.it>
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.18 i686; en-US; rv:0.9.1) Gecko/20010607
Dear Gianluca,
IMHO I'd prefer rather PSF photometry and reporting those PSF magnitudes.
Have a nice day
Rudolf
Gianluca Masi wrote:
>Dear Colleagues,
>I've been observing V446 Her, as part of the 2001 campaign presented to
>the VSNET by Nogami et al. But, you know, that variable is involved with
>a couple of stars, and while performing photometry with a normal
>equipment you have to measure those three stars (the variable + two
>normal objects) as a whole. Indeed, that is the strategy suggested by
>the campaign coordinators (they take care to remove the effect of the
>two stars), but I was wondering how one has to do in general, for
>example if she/he would like to report data to VSNET. Can she/he report
>the magnitude of the "complex" object (the three star in the case of
>V446 Her) or there is a better idea?
>
>Sincerely,
>Gianluca
>
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp