John Greaves wrote: > I doubt that this nearby red dwarf is an eclipsing binary. As it is obvious from Tycho 2 photometry, V1436 Aql is invariable (or at least 1.2923 d period resulted into scatter). I would like to point out V374 And. As I remember, it is also red dwarf and the E type variability came from three or four faint Hipparcos photometry magnitudes. I think that it was originally classified as SR in Hipparcos Annex C. Is anything further known about this star (period etc.)? Have a look on Hipparcos light curve of V627 Cas (=HIP 113373), symbiotic binary which is also very red (B-V=2.7 mag) and faint (nearly 13 mag in V). It shows some variability roughly consistent with published period. However, could the variability be due to ageing effects of Hipparcos' detectors? Despite the fact that many Hipparcos variables turned out to be really eclipsing binaries (EF Boo, CD Lyn), some of them didn't (probably V1436 Aql - does anyone know further examples?). I wonder how many such stars are included in GCVS. Will the GCVS team wait for accurate PEP for each individual object and then assign CST type of variability in the next edition of GCVS? Best regards, Ondrej Pejcha