[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 3815] Re: [vsnet-obs 30882] [FWD] data deletion
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 11:58:11 +0900 (JST)
- To: vsnet-obs@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp, vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- From: Hitoshi YAMAOKA <yamaoka@rc.kyushu-u.ac.jp>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 3815] Re: [vsnet-obs 30882] [FWD] data deletion
- Cc: yamaoka@rcsvr.rc.kyushu-u.ac.jp, mikesimonsen@mindspring.com, vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Dear Mike,
>Why would anyone suggest that Maciej's or my observations of IX Dra
>be deleted? We are both using a chart based on the Henden/ Sumner
>sequence for this star.
I guess that Patrick only noted that IX Dra should be classified as
UGSU, not only UG as written in CV-circular. Sorry for the confusion
I arose.
>As for deleting the observations of WY Tri, if it had been in
>outburst I believe I would have seen it in this field even though I
>was looking for it east of it's actual position. Indeed, if I thought
>my observations were of little or no value I would have already
>suggested they be excluded.
>
>I would be very interested to hear from vsnet as to what their policy
>is as far as DELETING! observations and exactly who would make this
>determination and why.
>
>If observations reported by observers are now to be evaluated, and
>their "authenticity" and value judged by other observers, I may have
>a few suggestions for deletions of my own!
Generally speaking, I guess the data deletion should be done with the
suggestion of the observer's own. On this case, I has misunderstood
that the deletion request has come from the observer so I have made a
forwarding post in order to note the deletion. After hearing Mike, my
opinion is that the observations of WY Tri by SXN should not be
deleted.
Sincerely Yours,
Hitoshi Yamaoka, on behalf of the VSNET manager
yamaoka@rc.kyushu-u.ac.jp
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp