Taichi Kato wrote [re AZh, 72, 400 (1995)] : > According to the full version of the paper (translated article), this >paper discusses the possibility of detecting such planets, and apparently >no discussion about individual objects. As far as I surveyed, the name >delta Vel only appears in the figure, which was apparently selected to >show the location on the diagram (mass of the primary versus semimajor axis >of potential planets) of a relatively massive "Vega-type" star. Thanks very much indeed for that. To the best of my knowledge "AZh" is one of the major Russian Astronomic periodicals... ...and I must admit I did find it a bit strange for a new variable to be noted in a Russian journal in 1995 and yet fail to appear in either the recent NSV supplement or either of Namelists 72, 73 or 75 ;^) [re the Aa pair... ...a little rough adding up [and don't quote me] gives the following : projected separation (1979) in AU = 0.6/0.04 = 15 [where 0.04 = parallax], and for the special case of a face on orbit that was circular [which is unlikely to be the real case, but it gives us something to work with] we could say that this was equivalent to the sem-major axis, so the period would be 15^(3/2), or 58 years, which tallies with the "few decades" estimated by the discoverers of this pairing, and is not appropriate in the context of the current eclipses. I'm quite willing to accept I've made an arithmetic error here though, cos I couldn't find the sums in the books, and have had to use my beleaguered memory] Note to eclipsing binary people : IF it turns out to be star A that is eclipsing, and given that star a orbits A in say 40 to 70 years, what are the chances, and more importantly timescale, of the "third body" affect via apsidal motion causing star A's orientation to go in and out of suitability for eclipses to occur? In other words, if this star has not been detected as an eclipser in the past, is it at all possible that is is simply because it has only started being so over the past few years, after a long period of not doing so, due to apsidal motion... ...if you follow?!?! Cheers John John Greaves UK