[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 3493] Re: [vsnet-be 27] Re: Delta Sco
- Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 17:54:59 +1200
- To: "Taichi Kato" <tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>, <vsnet-be@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>, <vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- From: "Stan Walker" <astroman@voyager.co.nz>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 3493] Re: [vsnet-be 27] Re: Delta Sco
- References: <200007270644.PAA11698@ceres.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Hi,
The present discussion on delta Scorpii as a Be or gamma Cas star prompts me
to ask about the latter. Quite a number of blue stars seem listed as gamma
Cas variables yet they don't do anything much. Some we've used as UBV
comparisons for decades without seeing any variation greater than 1%. Now
I'm not querying delta Sco - a good effort by Sebastian and my
congratulations - but I wonder how these others receive their
classifications. Is this from spectral measures, or what? And I wonder how
many blue stars are classed as low amplitude variables purely because of
poor extinction corrections or transformations to the standard UBV system.
Regards,
Stan
----- Original Message -----
From: Taichi Kato <tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
To: <vsnet-be@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>; <vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp