[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 3006] Suspected UG stars
- Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 14:15:38 +0200
- To: "vsnet-chat" <vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- From: "Maciej Reszelski" <macres@pro.onet.pl>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 3006] Suspected UG stars
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Friends,
Arne, Brian, Taichi, Timo thanks !
I check my GCVS v1.2 and IR Lyr still have mark UG:.
As Brian wrote UY Vul seems to be a red variable. Amplitude
taken from GCVS suggested Mira-type.
About DO Vul Timo Kinnunen wrote to me:
> Hello Maciej,
> I sent the following note to Patrick Schmeer to encourage
>observing DO Vul since it is a prospective SU UMa subclass
>candidate - however too faint for my visual observations.
>Also SW Vul is very faint.
> Hello Patrick,
...
> I browsed today a Tschesevich's book describing some
>variables in Aquila (Tschesevich 1978, written in Russian).
>He described two familiar dwarf novae: SW Vul and DO Vul.
>In both cases several outbursts of 16mag were recorded,
>but whereas SW Vul is a frequenter (per.~15d), DO Vul
>outbursts were infrequent. Tschesevich suggested a period
>around 90 days, but the obs. record did not show outb. intervals
>shorter than ~270d. Some of the outbursts lasted more than 8d.
>Certainly the period may be similar to RZ Sge, but I suspect
>this is anyway a likely SU UMa subclass candidate. The average
>period falls close to one year, so we may have to wait for years
>for a plausible superoutburst.
> The outb. magnitude is beyond my scope, so I'm afraid I will drop
>DO Vul from my regular targets.
>
>Regards,
>Timo Kinnunen
>
DO and SW Vul seems good CCD-target for the future !
Best regards,
Maciej
Maciej Reszelski
Al. 1-go Maja 29/4
64500 Szamotuly
Poland
E-mail: macres@pro.onet.pl
www : http://republika.pl/macres
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp