[vsnet-chat 2658] Re: RXJ0459.7+1926

["William S G Walker" <astroman@voyager.co.nz>]

Hi,

Saw the note regarding the amended superhump period. Oddly enough my
measures on Feb 6 agreed with the earlier period, more or less, but the
interval to similar measures on Feb 7 gave 0.0703. Tonight's data will help
a bit if the clouds keep away.

Tau3 is a much easier name than this RXJ thing. I don't see any real
difference between this appellation and TmzV85 and if it's going to get a
VS designation with the same speed why not us the easier name?

Why aren't the southern CVs performing? But at least I relaxed and spent a
few nights measuring some nice eclipses on Z Cha during the recent SO. It
was beginning to fade at 1300UT  Feb 7. Tau 3 has set by then from NZ.

Regards,
Stan 

----------
> From: Taichi Kato <tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
> To: vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

VSNET Home Page

Return to Daisaku Nogami

---

vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp