[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 2563] Re: NSV 4189
- Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 12:34:12 -0700 (MST)
- To: vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- From: Brian Skiff <bas@lowell.edu>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 2563] Re: NSV 4189
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
The GSC field around NSV 4189 was taken from a IIIa-J plate, so as a
result, the GSC magnitudes are closer to blue magnitudes than visual or V.
The Guide Star Photometric Catalogue sequence S633 is about a degree away.
Here are positions and BV data for these stars:
Name RA (2000) Dec s GSC V B-V mGSC delta
S633-A 8 39 50.5 -15 30 25 G 6011-0751 9.58 0.41 9.86 0.28
S633-B 8 39 55.6 -15 09 23 G 6011-0775 10.21 0.97 10.92 0.71
S633-C 8 40 23.9 -15 27 23 G 6012-0402 12.08 0.36 12.32 0.24
S633-D 8 39 32.1 -15 24 23 G 6011-0537 12.77 0.85 13.39 0.62
S633-E 8 39 54.0 -15 28 20 A 15.07 0.62
S633-F 8 39 38.8 -15 28 11 A 15.65 0.81
The last two columns show the GSC magnitudes and their difference from V.
There is clearly a color term in relation to the V magnitudes, since the two
somewhat blue stars have a smaller offset than the other stars. Since the
region is at about 15 deg galactic latitude, I would expect the redder stars
to dominate a random sample. Thus your best bet (lacking a proper sequence)
would be to use the GSC stars in your field as you are now, but make the
magnitudes brighter by 0.6 mag.
Hope this helps.
\Brian
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp