[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 2242] Re: (fwd) Nova Paper research
- Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 23:02:34 +0900 (JST)
- To: vsnet-chat
- From: Taichi Kato <tkato>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 2242] Re: (fwd) Nova Paper research
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Re: [vsnet-chat 2238] Re: (fwd) Nova Paper research
> PU Vulpeculae is a symbiotic nova with a period of ~13 years!
> This means a different binary configuration than in classical
> novae, so despite the thermonuclear runaway, exclusion from
> the nova list is justified.
Several questions:
1) What seperates novae from non-novae? Does binary configuration play
an essential part?
2) Has binary configuration of "justified novae" been confirmed anyway?
3) Recurrent novae have a broad spectrum in the sense of the binary
structure. Aren't they considered as "novae" with mutiple recorded
explosions?
Regards,
Taichi Kato
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp