[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 2241] PU Vul - Re:
- Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 14:54:18 +0100 (BST)
- To: Taichi Kato <tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- From: Alon Retter <ar@astro.keele.ac.uk>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 2241] PU Vul - Re:
- cc: vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- In-Reply-To: <199908201301.WAA08614@ceres.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
What is NC(+E?) ?
According to Nussbaumer & Vogel (1996, A&A, 307, 470)
PU Vulpeculae is a symbiotic nova with a period of ~13 years!
This means a different binary configuration than in classical
novae, so despite the thermonuclear runaway, exclusion from
the nova list is justified.
Regards,
Alon
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Alon Retter Tel. (work) +44-(0)1782-58-3493
Physics Dept. Fax (work) +44-(0)1782-711093
Keele University -----------------------------------
Staffordshire 'As a scientist I don't believe myself, so
ST5 5BG, U.K. why should I believe you?' (A.R. 1965-2085)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Taichi Kato wrote:
> Re: [vsnet-chat 2238] Re: (fwd) Nova Paper research
>
> I have recently received another related question. "Is PU Vul a nova?"
> This object is currently classified as NC(+E?). If the thermonuclear runaway
> on a white dwarf in a binary is the nature of the nova, is there any
> reason to exclude NC-type from the nova list?
>
> Regards,
> Taichi Kato
>
>
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp