[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 1260] Re: H/T chart vs. VT mags...
- Date: Fri, 04 Sep 1998 09:42:26 +0200
- To: "Fraser Farrell" <fraserf@dove.net.au>
- From: "FIDRICH Robert (Fidusz)" <fidusz@zpok.hu>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 1260] Re: H/T chart vs. VT mags...
- Cc: vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- In-Reply-To: <199809040250.MAA24897@dove.mtx.net.au>
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Hello,
Thanks for the info!
>It would seem that both Robert and Berto -- like me -- bought their
>Guide 6's as soon as they were released. These "early" Guide 6's
>do not show Tycho's Johnson V magnitudes.
No, I received it this sping (thanks Mr. Scovil!), but have not noticed
that the first "info" show Johnson V magnitudes until Mr. Kato wrote it. I
knew that the previous version used GSC mags for all stars and have not
noticed the change. By the way in the "more info" box in some cases I found
only VT magnitudes and this made me tought the H/T chart by VSNET team use
GSC magnitudes.
Sorry.
I think the use sequences from different origin causes more scatter the
comparison from onesource, I prefer VT mags for binocular variables in case
when we don't have AAVSO charts. Until the AAVSO comes out with new charts
with VT mags I gonna use old AAVSO charts and VT mags in the absence of
AAVSO charts with new VT mags...
What do you think?
Regards,
Robert Fidrich
HAA/VSS
fidusz@zpok.hu
http://vsnet.zpok.hu/albakor/fidusz
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp