[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 601] Re[2]: Low-dispersion CCD spectrograph?
- Date: 09 Sep 1997 14:28:12 -0700
- To: bas@lowell.edu (IPM Return requested), mbartels@efn.org (IPM Return requested), Stephen J Edberg <"/dd.ccMail=Stephen J Edberg at cas-mosb/"@cc2mhb.jpl.nasa.gov> (IPM Return requested)
- From: Stephen J Edberg <"/dd.ccMail=Stephen J Edberg at cas-mosb/"@cc2mhb.jpl.nasa.gov>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 601] Re[2]: Low-dispersion CCD spectrograph?
- Alternate-Recipient: Allowed
- cc: isn@mbox.queen.it (IPM Return requested), vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp (IPM Return requested)
- Conversion: Allowed
- Disclose-Recipients: Prohibited
- Original-Encoded-Information-Types: IA5-Text
- Priority: normal
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- X400-Content-Type: P2-1988 ( 22 )
- X400-MTS-Identifier: [/c=us/admd=telemail/prmd=nasa/; 007923415BF6C2BB-Proteus]
- X400-Originator: "/dd.ccMail=Stephen J Edberg at cas-mosb/"@cc2mhb.jpl.nasa.gov
- X400-Received: by mta Proteus in /c=us/admd=telemail/prmd=nasa/; Relayed; 09 Sep 1997 14:28:12 -0700
- X400-Received: by /c=us/admd=telemail/prmd=nasa/; Relayed; 09 Sep 1997 14:28:12 -0700
- X400-Recipients: non-disclosure;
I have hesitated to jump into the discussion until this point but I
think I have something ultimately constructive to add. The
spectroscope mentioned below is intended for visual use, and as such,
has sufficient dispersion for an observer to see spectral lines of
brighter stars. I haven't used this particular unit, but I have used
others over the years, and I've experimented photographically as well.
The relatively large dispersion of these units may be useable with a
CCD imager and a longish exposure. Photographically they would not
work well for stars fainter than about mag. 8.
I am only now entering the CCD age so I don't have results to report
using that medium, but relevant to the discussion is a photographic
experiment I performed a few years ago. (I am presently assigned to
work in Florida, far from my records in California, so please bear
with the necessary lack of specificity.)
I mounted a small wedge prism in the converging beam between the film
(Kodak T-Max 3200) and the optical assembly of an 5" f/10 Celestron, a
configuration known as non-objective spectroscopy. I intentionally
aimed at an emission line star in CMa, about mag. 8, and exposed for 5
- 10 minutes (no notes handy, sorry). The negative easily showed the
emission line star as a point while normal stars were small streaks,
and I had the impression that I would easily be able to detect spectra
of something like 3C-273, at mag. 13.
On the basis of this, I think that a wedge prism in front of a CCD
would be a powerful combination and able to go much fainter than my
photographic experiment. We just need a manufacturer to make a prism
in a filter holder that would substitute for a color filter in the
usual CCD imaging set-ups.
Steve Edberg
sedberg@jpl.nasa.gov
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Low-dispersion CCD spectrograph?
Author: mbartels@efn.org at Internet
Date: 09/07/97 10:16 AM
I notice that a new spectroscope is spotlighted in Sky and Telescope's
new product showcase. A visual phtoographic CCD model is available for
US$200, containing a blazed glass diffraction grating and a spectrum
widening cylindrical lens. I wonder if this would be 'good enough' for
brighter targets with medium large amateur scopes.?
--
Clear skies, Mel Bartels Programmer/Analyst, amateur astronomer
Eugene, Oregon, USA homepage: http://vsnet.efn.org/~mbartels
mailto:mbartels@efn.org atm, atm-digest list-owner
Motorize A Dob: http://zebu.uoregon.edu/~mbartels/altaz/altaz.html
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp