[vsnet-campaign 1080] Re: [vsnet-alert 6218] Re: WZ Sge: superhump period on Aug. 6

[gian.masi@flashnet.it]

Dear Colleagues,
please note that the combined three nights actually give us 
a value of 0.0571d, not 0.0582d. The latter was actually 
relative the the previous two nights. So, there is a good 
agreement with what reported by Kato.

It is clear that, after such a long night, we need some 
sleep! :)

Regards,
Gianluca and Franco


Scrive gian.masi@flashnet.it:

> Dear Colleagues,
> for the period estimate, from last night,  we found a 
> candidate of 0.0572d. The values we reported earlier 
> (0.0582d), was obtained combining the latest dataset with 
> the previous two days. Sorry for the confusion.
> 
> Regards,
> Gianluca and Franco
> 
> 
> Scrive Taichi Kato <tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>:
> 
> > WZ Sge: superhump period on Aug. 6
> > 
> > Dear Colleagues,
> > 
> >    The analysis of the data by G. Masi (vsnet-alert 
6215) 
> has yeilded
> > a period of 0.05711 +/- 0.00012 d, which seems to be 
> shorter than the
> > value by Masi (and the "initial" superhump period).  I 
> will make a
> > further
> > analysis using the combined data.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Taichi Kato
> > VSNET Collaboration team
> > 
> > 
>

VSNET Home Page

---

vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

VSNET Home Page

Return to Daisaku Nogami

---

vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp