Dear Colleagues, for the period estimate, from last night, we found a candidate of 0.0572d. The values we reported earlier (0.0582d), was obtained combining the latest dataset with the previous two days. Sorry for the confusion. Regards, Gianluca and Franco Scrive Taichi Kato <tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>: > WZ Sge: superhump period on Aug. 6 > > Dear Colleagues, > > The analysis of the data by G. Masi (vsnet-alert 6215) has yeilded > a period of 0.05711 +/- 0.00012 d, which seems to be shorter than the > value by Masi (and the "initial" superhump period). I will make a > further > analysis using the combined data. > > Regards, > Taichi Kato > VSNET Collaboration team > >