[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-campaign-nova 115] (fwd) [vsnet-chat 3922] [vsnet-alert 5499] Re: Possible Nova in Pup
- Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 19:27:02 +0900 (JST)
- To: vsnet-campaign-nova
- From: Taichi Kato <tkato>
- Subject: [vsnet-campaign-nova 115] (fwd) [vsnet-chat 3922] [vsnet-alert 5499] Re: Possible Nova in Pup
- Sender: owner-vsnet-campaign-nova@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
(fwd) [vsnet-chat 3922] [vsnet-alert 5499] Re: Possible Nova in Pup
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2001 12:09:57 +0200
From: "Berto Monard" <Lagmonar@csir.co.za>
Dear Taichi and nova enthousiasts,
If the located star is indeed the progenitor of the brightened object then
its presumed nova nature is improbable.
I still believe (and might have mentioned it earlier) that the Pup-Pyx-Vel
region must be one of the most under explored MW region in the sky and
quite a number of CVs might still be discovered there. This Nova? Pup 00
might be one of them...
Regards,
Berto
PS I didn't read e-mail since 24/12/00 and found quite some interesting
findings in my e-box. VSNET is doing a great info job!
We have to keep watch on TV Col. Could it be in a transition stage?
This is an exciting hobby!
>>> Taichi Kato <tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp> 01/02/01 11:59AM >>>
Re: Possible Nova in Pup
> I'm not able to identify this star on USNO A2.0 (no entry like this
around
> the suspetc position). As I said earlier, a good USNO A2.0 progenitor
> candidate (if this actually is a nova) is A0600.06937901; is, the entry
> above, related to a different USNO catalogue (A1.0, SA, AC2000...)?
Please
> note also that there is some difference in coordinates between A0600.0693
7901
> (which I indicate to be the probable progenitor) and USNO0600.03989187.
So,
> it could be interesting to know if the star reported by Dr. Kato comes
from
> a different USNO catalogue. Maybe these stars are the same.
These stars are the same. I used USNO A1.0. If we adopt the USNO A2.0
magnitudes, the V-J color is even more bluer (closer to a slightly
reddened
cataclysmic variable). I wonder how accurate A2.0 photometric calibration
in this field.
Regards,
Taichi Kato
PS. If this object is indeed a nova (I suspect so...), the proginitor is
one of the brightest ones in the recent dacades.
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp