Re: Possible Nova in Pup > I'm not able to identify this star on USNO A2.0 (no entry like this around > the suspetc position). As I said earlier, a good USNO A2.0 progenitor > candidate (if this actually is a nova) is A0600.06937901; is, the entry > above, related to a different USNO catalogue (A1.0, SA, AC2000...)? Please > note also that there is some difference in coordinates between A0600.06937901 > (which I indicate to be the probable progenitor) and USNO0600.03989187. So, > it could be interesting to know if the star reported by Dr. Kato comes from > a different USNO catalogue. Maybe these stars are the same. These stars are the same. I used USNO A1.0. If we adopt the USNO A2.0 magnitudes, the V-J color is even more bluer (closer to a slightly reddened cataclysmic variable). I wonder how accurate A2.0 photometric calibration in this field. Regards, Taichi Kato PS. If this object is indeed a nova (I suspect so...), the proginitor is one of the brightest ones in the recent dacades.