(fwd) Delta Sco (Bedding) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 14:02:48 +1100 (EST) From: Tim Bedding <bedding@Physics.usyd.edu.au> Subject: [vsnet-be 0] (No Subject in original) <M.H.vanKerkwijk@phys.uu.nl>, Waters Rens <rensw@astro.uva.nl>, l.b.f.m.waters@astro.rug.nl, Jacqueline Cote <jcote@sron.guspace.nl>, Lex Kaper <lexk@astro.uva.nl>, Petr Harmanec <hec@sunstel.asu.cas.cz, Alan MacRobert <amacrobert@skypub.com>, Joshua Roth <jroth@skypub.com> Subject: delta Sco (second attempt) BCC: bedding@physics.usyd.edu.au Hi Juan and Pablo (and everyone else interested in this star), I was very excited to hear about your discovery of Halpha emission in delta Sco (IAUC 7461), especially since I had predicted it! When you read the following, you will understand what I mean. ====================================================================== The orbit of the binary star Delta Scorpii Bedding 1993, Astron. J., 106, 768 Abstract: Although delta Sco is a bright and well-studied star, the details of its multiplicity have remained unclear. Here we present the first diffraction-limited image of this 0.12 arcsec binary star, made using optical interferometry, and resolve the confusion that has existed in the literature over its multiplicity. Examining published speckle measurements, together with the present result, reveals a periodicity of 10.5 yr and allows calculation of the orbital parameters. The orbit has a high eccentricity (e = 0.82) and large inclination (i = 70 deg), making it a favourable target for radial velocity measurements during the next periastron (in 2000). [... text of paper ...] Note added in proof. Cot\'e & van Kerkwijk (A&A, in press) have discovered delta Sco to be a Be star, with the Halpha line showing emission on the flanks of an absorption core. This makes delta Sco one of the brightest known Be stars (the Bright Star Catalogue lists only four Be stars that are brighter). Previous observations in the literature have shown no indication of Be behaviour in delta Sco and, interestingly, the Cot\'e & van Kerkwijk spectrum was taken only ten months after the last periastron of the system. It is tempting to speculate that the approach of the companion (about 600 Rsun = about 85 stellar radii) triggered the mechanism responsible for Be emission. I am grateful to Rens Waters for bringing this new result to my attention. ====================================================================== Since I wrote that paper, a revised (and better) orbit has been calculated by Hartkopf et al. (1996, AJ 111, 370). They got a period of P = 10.58 y and epoch of periastron of T = 1979.41, only slightly different from my values. Their periastron prediction is 2000.6 (i.e. July 2000). The main difference is that the eccentricity is even higher (e = 0.92), so that periastron was even closer than I thought. I am sure you are seeing Be activity triggered by the close approach of the companion. Very exciting! I wonder how long the Be emission will last. By the way, in calculating his orbit, Hartkopf et al. remarked that my 1993 observation is discrepant and was therefore given zero weight. My observation was actually made in 1991, not in 1993 -- he assigned it the wrong date and has since apologised. The addition of the corrected point does not affect the orbit very much. Cheers, Tim Bedding -- Tim Bedding School of Physics A28, University of Sydney 2006, AUSTRALIA Phone: +61 2 9351 2680 Fax: +61 2 9351 7726