Dear colleagues, Following the comments by H. Yamaoka [vsnet-alert 4508, 4543, 4546] and B. Skiff [vsnet-alert 4540, 4544, 4545] I have investigated the available DSS plates that cover the field around XTE J1118+48.0. Digitzed images of the plates were obtained from http://archive.stsci.edu/cgi-bin/dss_plate_finder From small extracts (5' x 5') of the epoch 1995.233 and 1953.187 plates I obtained the following positions of the possible progenitor to XTE J1118+48.0, called object X (USNO-A2.0 1350-07924726), and two nearby stars of mag. ~19 (A and B, not included in the USNO-A2.0 catalogue). Survey Name Epoch Object R.A. (2000.0) Decl. POSS-II Red 1995.233 X 11h18m10s.83 +48o02'13".3 POSS-E Red Plate 1953.187 X 11h18m10s.83 +48o02'12".7 POSS-II Red 1995.233 A 11h18m11s.95 +48o02'19".9 POSS-E Red Plate 1953.187 A 11h18m11s.82 +48o02'18".6 POSS-II Red 1995.233 B 11h18m09s.90 +48o02'34".3 POSS-E Red Plate 1953.187 B 11h18m09s.91 +48o02'33".8 The positions were deduced by using six USNO-A2.0 stars, with mean residuals of 0".8 and 0".3 for the 1995 and 1953 plates, respectively. From this I conclude that it is highly probable that USNO-A2.0 1350-07924726 is the progenitor to XTE J1118+48.0. This object has shown no clear proper motion since 1953. However, object A appears to haved moved somewhat (by ~2") during this time interval. The apparent progenitor appeared faint (mag. ~18.5 or fainter) on all DSS images. Yours sincerely, Bjorn H. Granslo