cf. vsnet-chat 1802 http://vsnet.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp/vsnet/Mail/vsnet-chat/msg01802.html cf. vsnet-chat 1803 http://vsnet.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp/vsnet/Mail/vsnet-chat/msg01803.html cf. vsnet-chart 148 http://vsnet.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp/vsnet/Mail/vsnet-chart/msg00148.html Dear SN watchers, Yesterday, IAUC 7149 announced the discovery of a possible supernova in very nearby galaxy by Lick team. However, the nature of this new object is very uncertain, so it is very interesting. The location of the new object is: R.A. = 10h19m46s.81, Decl. = +45o31'35".0 (2000.0), which is about 86" west and 84" south of the nucleus of NGC 3198. This SBc galaxy is apparently very large, so this location is the inside of the spiral arm. There is a foreground star with magnitude about 17 (U1350_07913851), from which the new object is about 28" east and 16" south. Turry's "Nearby Galaxy Catalog" tells that the distance module of NGC 3198 is 30.17, which is about 1 mag nearer than M 87 (Virgo center). The reported magnitudes up to now are: 980324.2 >190:C KAI 990329.2 >175:C KAI 990403.2 >175:C KAI 990415.2 184:C KAI 990419.2 180:C KAI 990420.2 178:C KAI , which indicates that this object is in (relatively) slowly brightening phase. The mystery is that these magnitudes are very faint as a supernova in such nearby distance. Typical SNeIa without absorption will be 11.3 mag at their maximum, and even the gravitational collapse-driven SNe will be at least 15 mag or so around maximum. The initial brightning phase of supernovae (of any type) are usually more rapid than this object. The rare example, SN 1987A, had shown a slow brightning after a short plateau phase (about 1 week, which is explained as being due to helium recombination), and at this plateau phase its absolute V magnitude was about -13.5. If SN 1987A is on NGC 3198, this initial plateau would be observed as 16.7 mag or so, which is still brighter than the new object. Before the initial plateau, SN 1987A has also rapidly brightened. Then the nature of this object can be one of below: a. an intrinsically very dim supernova, b. a normal supernova affected by the extreme absorption, c. a foreground (Galactic) variable such as a dwarf nova. It is needless to say that the spectroscopy is extremely desired, and also the followup photometry and magnitude estimates. Sincerely Yours, Hitoshi Yamaoka, Kyushu Univ., Japan yamaoka@rc.kyushu-u.ac.jp