Hi, In endorsing the new and better sequence package for Nova Oph 1998, posted on VSNET on 23/6, I would like to change my two most recent estimates as follows: 980621.790 119 (B. Monard) 980622.728 123 (B. Monard) Although my 19/6/98 estimate looks a bit off line with that of other observers on VSNET, I hereby like to confirm it. H/T sequences were used and the nova looked significantly fainter than the 110 (0,4) star to the NNW of it at the end of the observation. I had the distinct impression that the nova looked more around 110 at the beginning of the observation. Could the nova have lost some brightness in a time span of 2-3 minutes? An eclipse perhaps? Maybe I just made a bad estimate, and repeated it the next night. Regards, Berto Monard / MLF Pretoria >>> Taichi Kato <tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp> 06/23/98 04:58AM >>> Nova Oph 1998 (update) YYMMDD(UT) mag observer 980521.626 <110V (K. Kosaka) 980531.622 <118V (K. Kosaka) 980615.560 95p (K. Takamizawa) 980615.564 95p (K. Takamizawa) 980617.935 106 (K. Hornoch) 980618.160 106 (B. King) 980618.494 107 (S. Takahashi) 980618.521 10.68V (S. Kiyota) 980618.620 107 (P. Nelson) 980618.789 106 (B. Monard) 980618.992 106 (P. Schmeer) 980619.142 107 (R. J. Modic) 980619.815 113 (B. Monard) 980619.897 108 (K. Hornoch) 980619.930 109 (J. Ripero) 980620.213 108 (R. J. Modic) 980620.512 107 (R. Stubbings) 980620.523 107 (S. Takahashi) 980620.562 107 (H. Maehara) 980620.610 107p (K. Takamizawa) 980620.662 108 (M. Funada) 980620.738 112 (B. Monard) 980621.292 109 (R. J. Modic) 980621.790 124: (B. Monard) 980621.951 120 (G. Poyner) 980622.728 129: (B. Monard)