[vsnet-alert 1634] CI Cam = XTE J0421+560 (Bailyn)

[Taichi Kato <tkato>]

From owner-vsnet-err@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp Sun Apr  5 09:20 JST 1998
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 1998 09:16:35 +0900 (JST)
To: bailyn@astro.yale.edu
Cc: owner-vsnet-alert@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
From: The "vsnet-alert" mailing list maintainer <owner-vsnet-alert@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
Subject: [vsnet-err 60158] Submission to "vsnet-alert" rejected
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 2035

You can't send message to this mailing list. Only addresses listed in
our member file can post to the "vsnet-alert" mailing list.

Please send request to <vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>, instead.

--
VSNET Administrators / vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

---- unsent message header follows ----
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 1998 12:09:00 -0500 (EST)
From: Charles Bailyn <bailyn@astro.yale.edu>
To: Mike Garcia <garcia@cfa219.harvard.edu>
cc: ajct@laeff.esa.es, chaswell@star.maps.susx.ac.uk,
        e.kuulkers1@physics.oxford.ac.uk, fghigo@nrao.edu,
        Charles Bailyn <bailyn@astro.yale.edu>, guy@mrao.cam.ac.uk,
        ewaltman@rsd.nrl.navy.mil, jem@head-cfa.harvard.edu,
        lewin@space.mit.edu, marshall@milkyway.gsfc.nasa.gov,
        pac@astro.ox.ac.uk, rhjellmi@aoc.nrao.edu, rmw@lowell.Lowell.Edu,
        rpf@astro.uva.nl, rr@space.mit.edu, shrader@grossc.gsfc.nasa.gov,
        starrfie@hydro.la.asu.edu, stroh@pcasun1.gsfc.nasa.gov,
        swank@pcasun1.gsfc.nasa.gov, takeshim@ginpo.gsfc.nasa.gov,
        tavani@astro.columbia.edu, narayan@cfa.harvard.edu,
        vsnet-alert@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
In-Reply-To: <199804032221.RAA07680@cfa219>
Message-ID: <vsnet-alert1634@hoge.baba.hajime.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute [version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel=24]
X-Sequence: vsnet-alert 0
Subject: [vsnet-alert 0] Re: CI CAM = XTEJ0421+560 
Errors-To: owner-vsnet-alert@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Sender: owner-vsnet-alert@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp


Just an informal note to everyone to report that we took some images
with WIYN - given the 3.5m aperture, CI Cam was saturated, but visual
inspection suggests that there are no other objects above 20th magnitude
which have brightened significantly with respect to the sky survey and are
compatible with the RXTE X-ray coordinates.  The complete data will
arrive in New Haven tomorrow, and we will take a closer look, but I don't
think anything else is there.

Charles Bailyn

VSNET Home Page

Return to Daisaku Nogami

---

vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp