[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-obs 20457] [FWD] KAIT calibration of SN 1999by magnitures
- Date: Thu, 6 May 1999 12:03:57 +0900 (JST)
- To: vsnet-obs@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp, isn_chat@supernovae.net
- From: Hitoshi YAMAOKA <yamaoka@rc.kyushu-u.ac.jp>
- Subject: [vsnet-obs 20457] [FWD] KAIT calibration of SN 1999by magnitures
- Cc: yamaoka@rcsvr.rc.kyushu-u.ac.jp
- Sender: owner-vsnet-obs@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
[FWD] KAIT calibration of SN 1999by magnitures
Dr. Weidong Li, a member of LOSS KAIT team, has kindly provided their
revised magnitudes of SN 1999by using Brian's sequence [vsnet-alert
2919]. Note that he used the star 3, 4, and 5, then the revision in
[vsnet-alert 2937] does not affect his results.
Dr. Li wrote:
>First, I used the Hubble Space Telescope Guide Star Catalog to
>get positions and magnitude info for all the stars in the field
>of NGC 2841, and I don't know the correlation between the HSTGSC
>magnitudes and GSC or UNSO ones. Comparing the V magnitudes for
>3 stars that you provided which are also included in the HSTGSC
>catalog, I found an offset of about 0.2 mag between the two
>catalogs, with the HSTGSC brighter. Thus the unfiltered magnitude
>for our discovery images should be something like this, if I
>used the V magnitude you provided (the clear filter is indeed
>very close to V band anyway),
>
>Apr 30.2 UT, 15.9
>May 01.2 UT, 15.3
>May 02.2 UT, 14.8
>
>We had UBVRI observations for 99by on May 2 UT, and using the
>BVRI sequence you provided, I got the magnitudes for the SN
>as listed in the following. These results used 3 stars in the
>catalog you provided, namely star 3 (13.51), 4 (13.77) and 5
>(14.19). I think the sequence is pretty good as the RMS for the
>results is pretty small.
>
>SN 1999by on May 2.2 UT,
>
>B = 14.97 +/- 0.07
>V = 14.63 +/- 0.03
>R = 14.52 +/- 0.03
>I = 14.38 +/- 0.04
>
>Please let me know if you have other questions.
>
>By the way, the weather has been bad for the past two days
>here, but we may have observations in the next couple of
>days.
>
>Sincerely yours,
>
>Weidong Li, University of California, Berkeley
Reformatted:
SN1999by 990430.2 159C KAIT
SN1999by 990501.1 153C KAIT
SN1999by 990502.2 148C KAIT
SN1999by 990502.2 14.97B KAIT
SN1999by 990502.2 14.63V KAIT
SN1999by 990502.2 14.52R KAIT
SN1999by 990502.2 14.38I KAIT
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp