[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-obs 1720] KM Lac & FY Vul
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 1995 15:54:44 +0100
- To: "'VSNET-OBS'" <vsnet-obs@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- From: "Lasse Teist Jensen, LTJ" <lasse.teist@thranethrane.dk400.dk>
- Subject: [vsnet-obs 1720] KM Lac & FY Vul
- Sender: owner-vsnet-obs@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- X400-Content-Type: P2-1984 (2)
- X400-MTS-Identifier: [/PRMD=thranethrane/ADMD=dk400/C=dk/;951218145444]
- X400-Originator: lasse.teist@thranethrane.dk400.dk
- X400-Received: by mta danpost4.uni-c.dk in /PRMD=minerva/ADMD=dk400/C=dk/; Relayed; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 15:45:45 +0100
- X400-Received: by /ADMD=DK400 /C=DK/; Relayed; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 15:45:23 +0100
- X400-Received: by /PRMD=thranethrane/ADMD=dk400/C=dk/; Relayed; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 15:54:44 +0100
- X400-Recipients: vsnet-obs@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Dear Colleagues,
Identication problems.
All my observations of the star marked on Downes&Shara as KM Lac are in
the range 14.5 - 14.8.
All my observations of the star marked on Downes&Shara as FY Vul are in
the range 13.8 - 14.2.
Naturally identification problems are the most probable explanation for the
observations.
But what is the probability that we are in fact seeing standstills of KM Lac
and FY Vul ?
Have spectroscopical observations showed that the stars are not CV's ?
Regards
Lasse Teist Jensen (JLT)
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp