[vsnet-chat 6906] Re: v511 observation

Hi Taichi.

sorry for the short name used for the report, but I don't understand your request about the quality.

This report is much different since the previous.

The identification of the star is correct.

I have reported the telescope used, the 35 mm film type and the time exposure.

I Have measured the magnitude used Astroart program and GSC Tycho catalog and 6 stars of the field.

This is not sufficient to satisfy the quality?

Regards,

Toni scarmato

> Re: [vsnet-obs 47112] v511 observation
>
>    Not v511, but "V511 Cyg". Write the object name correctly.
>
> > I am looking at some images taken on 20030921 of field's Cygnus with a
> > 25 cm Newton telescope
> > f/4.8 on a 35 mm film T Max 400 b/w, 5 minutes of exposure.
> >
> > I Have found that CYGV511 is brigther than the magnitude reported in
> > gcvs200 catalog
> > 14.7-16.9p.
>
>    You must have read the earlier problem associated with the same object.
> You must first of all state how the identification problem was solved
> before making another report without much details. You must explain
> how you become confident that you have attained the requested quality.
> Without this information, your reports will be simple garbage.
>
>    See below:
>
> ===
>
> > Re: [vsnet-obs 46184] p magnitude of variable stars
> >
> > > CYGV511 20030721.862 11.27p TSc (+/-0.12)
> > > CYGV511 20030721.869 11.15p TSc (+/-0.18)
> >
> >    It is obvious that you still don't pay attention to make correct
> > identifications. We have said this enough, and we don't need your
> > similar observations any more. This region of the sky has been fully
> > examined for correct identifications by the GCVS team. There is no
> > excuse for you not to refer to the official correct IDs.
> >
>
> ===
>
> > Really I Have make attention at this observation because I Have noted the
> > nonstar GSC 3574:2369 at position 20 43 17.31 +45 45 3.5.
> >
> > I Have decided to send the data because I Have measured the following
> > astrometric position on the images: AR 20 43 17.270(+/-0.544) decl +45 45
> > 25.18(+/-5.47 arcsec), using 11 stars of the GSC Tycho Catalog.
> >
> > Unfortunateky I not can to use USNO A2 to make more precise astrometry.
>
>    As all but you must be aware, this is nothing related to variable star
> identification. What is needed for you before reporting anything is to
> make correct identification. Before this is firmly established, you
> are requested not to report anything. You are no longer a novice
> person, and you must understand what process is necessary before reporting.
>
>    Until you become confident that you have attained the above quality,
> don't reply to this message, which would be simply a loss of everyone's time.
> (If you are going to discuss on general matters of variable star
> identifications, use vsnet-chat rather than vsnet-obs).
>
> Regards,
> Taichi Kato
>
>