>> 2 19:07:37.07 +44:00:20.1 15.0 (Romano) I have looked at the Romano IBVS flyer, and indeed the star pointed to by the GCVS on-line is wrong. Mati's revised position is the star pointed to by Romano's chart. Unless the GCVS folks have unpublished info, then the position needs to be corrected. 'Best' position is again probably that from 2MASS: V449 Lyr: 19 07 37.06 +44 00 19.9 (J2000) ...and 1RXS J190716.8+440109 is only 8" away (the plot thickens). I notice also in SIMBAD that Henden & Honeycutt have published BV data for comparison stars in the field (for MV Lyr), but the data do not include V449 Lyr, only stars somewhat to the west. Along with the data Mati cites, the star appears in the Lick NPM2 prelim catalogue with V=15.2, B-V=0.9. This is consistenet with the 2MASS color J-K=0.5. Despite the change in star ID, it still looks like a possible RS CVn, given the medium-red color and x-ray detection. \Brian
Return to the Powerful Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp