[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 2961] (fwd) Re: Tycho,Tycho-2,Hipparcos magnitudes
- Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 12:03:24 +0900 (JST)
- To: vsnet-chat
- From: Taichi Kato <tkato>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 2961] (fwd) Re: Tycho,Tycho-2,Hipparcos magnitudes
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
(fwd) Re: Tycho,Tycho-2,Hipparcos magnitudes
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 19:55:41 -0700 (MST)
From: Brian Skiff <bas@lowell.edu>
Message-ID: <20002961@hoge.baba.hajime.jp>
To: tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Subject: Re: [vsnet-chat 2959] (fwd) Tycho,Tycho-2,Hipparcos magnitudes
Cc: vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Is there perhaps a confusion here between the "instrumental" Tycho
magnitudes (VT and BT) and magnitudes corrected to the standard system?
Although Hipparcos magnitudes for bright stars have high _precision_,
their _accuracy_ is low, and of course these are also not on any standard
system. The Tycho-1 catalogue was supplied with corrected V and B-V, but
Tycho-2 was not---could this be causing confusion amongst observers?
Certainly the tests that John Greaves and I ran of (corrected) Tycho-2
against standard catalogues showed that Tycho-2 was invariably better
over the entire magnitude range.
\Brian
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp