[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 243] Re: PDM troubles
- Date: Sun, 20 Apr 1997 14:18:43 +0900 (JST)
- To: vsnet-chat
- From: Taichi Kato <tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 243] Re: PDM troubles
- Cc: fraserf@dove.net.au
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Self-comment:
> The denoted "sigma" is likely to be a measure of the half width of the
> fitted parabola, extrapolated to the zero signal level (P=0), then
> normalized by the degree of freedom (probably assuming the deviation from
> the periodic signal is random and uncorrelated).
Fourier power should become zero when a shift in trial frequency makes
an effective phase shift of pi (period/2) to the observed data. So this
would approximate Dr. Mennickent's estimate (vsnet-chat 234) disregarding
the factor arising from the number of observed points.
> A good feeling of the error can be obtained from (order of magnitude)
> P*P/2*T, being P the period and T the range of observing time.
Regards,
Taichi Kato
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp