[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 231] Re: PDM troubles (correction)
- Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 15:47:35 +0900 (JST)
- To: vsnet-chat
- From: Taichi Kato <tkato>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 231] Re: PDM troubles (correction)
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Sorry, simple mistake (vsnetchat 229).
> The baseline of 100
> cycles (typically less than a week) would then yield a typical error of
> 0.000001 to 0.000002 day, assuming no variation in period and superhump
--------------------
should be 0.00001 to 0.00002 day
> profile.
I look forward to hearing from other "period analysts" on determination
of errors of period estimates, since this point is quite often a focus of
debate.
Regards,
Taichi Kato
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp