[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 179] V vs v
- Date: Wed, 05 Mar 1997 16:34:20 +0200
- To: vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp, aavso-discussion@physics.mcmaster.ca
- From: Berto Monard <lagmonar@csir.co.za>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 179] V vs v
- Disclaimer: The CSIR exercises no editorial control over E-mail messages originating in the organisation and the views in this message are therefore not necessarily those of the CSIR and/or its employees.
- Encoding: 23 Text
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Dear readers,
I would like to touch on the possible discrepancy in the reporting
of visually observed magnitudes.
In order to do the correct thing we must use v sequences, not V.
How many charts have v sequences?
To avoid any misunderstanding on my side: I assume V is meant
to be photometric V ( = photopic response) and v is visual ( =
'mostly(?)' scotopic response). B magnitudes originate from
measurements in the blue B-band as defined...
In general it can be stated that v = 0,6 V + 0,4 B. This means that in
the case of red objects v -V often > 0,5.
Question is, how should we go about it? If the sequences are
given in V and B we can convert them to v. Is that practical?
Guidelines please!
Regards,
Berto Monard
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp