[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-campaign-dn 3749] Re: Analysis of the June 05/06, 2003 observations of GO Com (CBA Belgium Observatory)
- Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 14:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
- To: cba-news <news@cba.phys.columbia.edu>
- From: Lew Cook <lcoo@yahoo.com>
- Subject: [vsnet-campaign-dn 3749] Re: Analysis of the June 05/06, 2003 observations of GO Com (CBA Belgium Observatory)
- Cc: vsnet-campaign-dn <vsnet-campaign-dn@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>,Vsnet-Outburst <vsnet-outburst@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- Delivered-To: vsnet-campaign-dn-archive@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- Delivered-To: vsnet-campaign-dn@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- In-Reply-To: <NBBBJKIECBCGIADLBIHHIEKLFLAA.Tonny.Vanmunster@cbabelgium.com>
- Sender: owner-vsnet-campaign-dn@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
I also ran a PDM on my 2 nights of data and find the
following superhump characteristics:
June 5 JD2452795.7 0.0671 d period 0.26 mag amplitude
June 6 JD2452796.7 0.0633 d period 0.16 mag amplitude
Regards, Lew
--- Tonny Vanmunster <Tonny.Vanmunster@cbabelgium.com>
wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> I have just finished analysing my June 05/06, 2003 CCD
> observations of GO Com. During a 4.1 hours observing
session, superhumps with an amplitude of 0.25 mag were
clearly present. Using the PDM technique, I derived a
> superhump period of 0.0635 +/- 0.0003 d, a value that is
> consistent with earlier reportings. -snip-
Return to Home Page
Return to the Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Powered by ooruri technology